Churchill scholar statements

    By Bruce Johansen


    The present controversy has focused on only a tiny fraction of Prof.
    Churchill's work. I have read some of his books, and find them to be
    well-argued and intensively documented in a scholarly manner.
    He occasionally has referenced my work, and he has done so properly.
    I realize that some of what he has written has incited controversy.
    I believe that engagement in controversy is proper for a scholar;
    any line between "activism" and "scholarship" is artificial.
    In my work I have advanced ideas regarding the role of the Iroquois
    Confederacy in the evolution of democracy that have become the object
    of intense scrutiny and intense controversy. Controversy and activism
    are necessary ingredients in the contest of ideas on which the academy
    should be based.


A forum for empowerment
__________________


Blog

__________________


Behind the Myth

__________________


More on Columbia

__________________


Get Involved

__________________


Useful Sites

__________________


Search

__________________